waklaboo
December 31st, 2011, 12:09 PM
Check out this link:
http://www.landrights.com/primer_on_...ain_rights.htm
scroll down halfway to: CITIES AND COUNTIES CANNOT VIOLATE RACKETEERING LAWS
I think this is where Sadavaoito was copying from. Interesting read but I didn't get into it much because I want to watch the UFC Lesnar vs Overreem fight.
Note that the compilers' comments are in italics.
=============================================
I'm reading this link in between rounds and realize that there is a lot of material here to help educate members of the fraternity specially in CALI as the author comments mostly on California laws. Many are based on U.S. Codes so this in effect may apply to the other States as well. The way I see it there is still hope.
Among interesting notes are....
[California Constitution Article 1, section 19 Eminent Domain: “Private property may be taken or damaged for public use only when just compensation, ascertained by a jury unless waived, has first been paid to, or into court for, the owner.” In an unpublished court order in the Daily Appellate, the Sierra Club was ordered to post a Bond of $250,000 for a “takings” because it didn’t want some logger to cut down his own trees. If private corporations or individuals such as the Humane Society wish to get rid of all roosters and restrict ownership of other pets and livestock in the County, they must likewise pay for it by putting up a Bond.]
[The “Humane” Society was declared by the FBI to be an “animal terrorist organization” in 1993, yet they not shut down thanks to bribe money used to void judgments against them in court.]
[Title 18 U.S.C. section 3112. Repealed November 16, 1981. This federal law used to provide for the issuance of search warrants for seizure of animals, birds, and eggs, but it was repealed, which means that it has been illegal since 1981 for anybody to issue a warrant to seize an animal, a bird, or an egg. The County is liable for any of its cities, agents or employees acting outside the law to restrict ownership of livestock, and using fear, threat, intimidation, and fraud to coerce citizens to give up their property rights.]
http://www.landrights.com/primer_on_...ain_rights.htm
scroll down halfway to: CITIES AND COUNTIES CANNOT VIOLATE RACKETEERING LAWS
I think this is where Sadavaoito was copying from. Interesting read but I didn't get into it much because I want to watch the UFC Lesnar vs Overreem fight.
Note that the compilers' comments are in italics.
=============================================
I'm reading this link in between rounds and realize that there is a lot of material here to help educate members of the fraternity specially in CALI as the author comments mostly on California laws. Many are based on U.S. Codes so this in effect may apply to the other States as well. The way I see it there is still hope.
Among interesting notes are....
[California Constitution Article 1, section 19 Eminent Domain: “Private property may be taken or damaged for public use only when just compensation, ascertained by a jury unless waived, has first been paid to, or into court for, the owner.” In an unpublished court order in the Daily Appellate, the Sierra Club was ordered to post a Bond of $250,000 for a “takings” because it didn’t want some logger to cut down his own trees. If private corporations or individuals such as the Humane Society wish to get rid of all roosters and restrict ownership of other pets and livestock in the County, they must likewise pay for it by putting up a Bond.]
[The “Humane” Society was declared by the FBI to be an “animal terrorist organization” in 1993, yet they not shut down thanks to bribe money used to void judgments against them in court.]
[Title 18 U.S.C. section 3112. Repealed November 16, 1981. This federal law used to provide for the issuance of search warrants for seizure of animals, birds, and eggs, but it was repealed, which means that it has been illegal since 1981 for anybody to issue a warrant to seize an animal, a bird, or an egg. The County is liable for any of its cities, agents or employees acting outside the law to restrict ownership of livestock, and using fear, threat, intimidation, and fraud to coerce citizens to give up their property rights.]